GeoJupyter core community meeting 2025-06-11

Meeting notes

A monthly gathering of the GeoJupyter core community. Open to all!

Author

The GeoJupyter community

Published

June 11, 2025

GeoJupyter core community meeting 2025-06-11

Please add new agenda items under the New agenda items heading!

Attendees

Your name / GitHub ID / affiliation / what do you plan to do when taking a break today?

  • Arjun Verma / @arjxn-py / QuantStack / Spend time with my niece
  • Nicolas Brichet / @brichet / QuantStack / ?
  • Martin Renou / @martinRenou / QuantStack / Did some tidying in the shed
  • Matt Fisher / @mfisher87 / Schmidt DSE / pull some weeds in my garden! 🌱
  • Tyler Erickson / @tylere / VorGeo / shopping at Trader Joes

Standing items

    • What’s going well?
      • I think the new project board is working great!
      • Everyone is awesome and helps each other out
    • Areas for improvement?
      • More diversity (companies, geographic) in contributor base

Follow-up from previous meeting(s)

  • [ ]

New agenda items

    • Will work on Symbology rough edges first!
    • Implementation / architecture thoughts?
    • (Martin) Guy started recently, working on processing toolbox. Started adding gdal commands to the schema to help refactor the schema functions in TS to reduce the number of places a change is required to add more processing commands.
      • What about processing functions that are conditional based on the layer type?
        • Martin: Instead of disabling buttons, let’s show a nice error.
          • Matt: What about simple cases like disabling based solely on layer type?
      • Matt: Planning to try and meet up with Guy and chat during the morning sometime soon.
    • Nicolas: Do the processing steps save in the shared document?
      • Martin: There’s a checkbox in the dialog to either save as a separate file or to embed the data in the shared document.
    • Tyler: Not familiar on what will be taught yet! Helper.
    • TODO (Matt): Save the workshop under workshops.geojupyter.org!
    • Can we do a release beforehand? It’d be great, but let’s not rush it :)

Pushed to next meeting

  • [ ]